2018 is going to be a fantastic year for those of us who love the Marvel Universe. This year we are blessed with Avengers: Infinity War, Deadpool 2, Ant-Man and The Wasp, and Venom. [Click any of those titles to open a new window where you can see the official trailer.] And the very first one out of the gate is definitely setting the pace. Black Panther officially opens in Canada and the US today, and it is a force to be reckoned with. I am lucky enough to live near a Cineplex theater that shows blockbusters starting the night before, so our family always goes to see superhero movies on the Thursday before official open. Last night we went to see King T'Challa show us the wonders of his beautiful Wakanda. As I say with all of my reviews... I am really weak at writing a succinct synopsis, so I give you this one from google.ca: The Black Panther movie stars Chadwick Boseman as King T'Challa/Black Panther, Michael B. Jordan as Erik Killmonger, Lupita Nyong'o as Nakia, Danai Gurira as Okoye, Martin Freeman as Everett K. Ross, Daniel Kaluuya as W'Kabi, Letitia Wright as Shuri, Angela Bassett as Ramonda, Forest Whitaker as Zuri, Winston Duke as M'Baku, and finally, Andy Serkis as Ulysses Klaue. To say that this movie is packed with talent is an understatement. We have some big names like Angela Bassett and Forest Whitaker, Oscar nominees like Daniel Kaluuya, fan favorites like Danai Gurira (I am so in love with her as Michonne on AMC's The Walking Dead), and some up and coming talent like Letitia Wright (she's done mostly TV until now). It's a wonderful cast and the chemistry between the characters is spot on. I would be remiss not to point out (if you haven't already noticed), the predominantly black cast. I feel like Marvel released Black Panther in February not only to warm cold Canadians, but more importantly to celebrate Black History Month. This cast is strong, talented, and as if you needed more, there are so many strong black female characters, you could say they carry the story. Black Panther gives so much to its audience. There's so much action, you definitely know you're watching a Marvel Studios movie. It's an origin story, because although we were introduced to the Black Panther in Avengers: Civil War, we know little of this character so far. But it is so much more than just an introduction to King T'Challa; we are told the lore behind the Black Panther and taken on a tour of the beautiful hidden city of Wakanda, a place the outside world knows as a third world farming community that is in actuality the most technologically advanced society on the planet, thanks to their mountain made of vibranium (the stuff that makes up Captain America's shield). Marvel Puzzle Quest screenshot Aside from loads of action, this movie packs sadness, happiness, beauty, and duty to country in equal parts to give us an extremely well-balanced film. I was absolutely in love with the way the director, Ryan Coogler, blended the traditional look of African Tribal Elders, farmers, and royalty with technology. The "coronation" of King T'Challa was fantastic, wild, and visually stunning. The soundtrack is nothing to sneeze at either. Available on Spotify, it boasts talent like Kendrick Lamar, 2 Chainz, Khalid, and The Weeknd. You can also download for free the February issue of Cineplex Magazine here, where you can read a short interview with the King himself, Chadwick Boseman. There's also a short intro to the timeline of Black Superheroes in the Marvel Universe (in the comics). Whether you're in to superhero movies or not, Black Panther is worth a watch. It has a great story, is visually stunning, boasts some stellar acting, and shows off some pretty imaginative technology. I give this movie 5 movie passes out of 5.
0 Comments
Yesterday, as I set out to do some laundry, I went through the usual motions: turn on the TV and search Netflix for something to play in the background as I flit around. I searched for the usual fare: documentaries, true crime shows, alien mysteries, historical stuff. Usually you don't have to watch very intently to get the gist of what's going on at any given moment, and I usually end up watching it a second time if its interesting enough. As I'm browsing through the fare on offer, the picture above catches my eye in the "Trending Now" section. I thought it may be a documentary about the underwater sculpture park in Grenada, and that sounded interesting, so I dove right in (pun intended). As soon as the documentary began, I realized that it was not, in fact, about the sculpture park, but something even better: a search for lost treasure. I love shows about lost treasure, but I often find them highly unsatisfying. Usually the only thing they find is that they're on a wild goose chase with nothing to show for their efforts, or they do find something interesting, but we end the movie or series with the crew wrapping up their find while they await proper approvals and fight over who owns what. There's also the case of "The Curse of Oak Island", a show, I'm embarrassed to admit, I have been watching now for five seasons! And all they've found is some bits of bone, pottery, book binding, and a coin. Basically, nothing I've watched yet has given me any satisfaction. Until I watched Treasures From the Wreck of the Unbelievable. I watched the story unfold. How they came upon a video and decided they had to find that spot and search for more treasure. How they found the perfect person to fund the excursion (a bored artist not sure what to do next), and suddenly, miraculously, treasure! Not just any treasure, either. Magnificent Objects D'Art were surfacing at an unbelievable rate. Sculptures from all over the world, coins pointing to the time of Nero, a piece of the ship hinting that the vessel could rival anything Noah may have built. And then the gold. Stunning pieces of art glinting on the bottom of the ocean. Millions (billions?) of dollars worth of golden sculpture. When the first piece broke the surface of the water, it took my breath away as I stood in front of my television, mouth agape, like a five-year old child. Not only was there satisfaction in the sheer number and beauty of the artifacts steadily breaking the surface, but there was a fantastical theory about who these treasures may have belonged to, and why they were all on the same ship all at the same time. Legend tells us of a freed slave named Amotan, from Antioch in north-west Turkey. He amassed an extraordinary fortune and spent it on glorious treasures from all over. He loaded 100 of his most precious onto a colossal ship called the Apistos and sailed away to build and furnish a lavish temple to the sun god Apollo. Amotan's ship sank and lay undiscovered for almost two millennia, his treasures and story lost to time. I also found great satisfaction that about three quarters of the way through the documentary, we are shown not only oceanic shots of the treasures, but also the sculpture, cleaned (but not excessively, I loved that corals and other marine life were left in situ on the pieces), and on display at a museum in Venice, Italy. I was so entranced by this movie, that after dinner I put it on again, so my husband could also enjoy it. He marveled at everything right along side me. However, he does not watch anything with the child-like innocence that I do, and he did bring up some questionable material. But I shushed him, and we continued to watch. When I woke up today I decided that I had to a) find out more about this treasure; and b) blog about it. I'd like to say that I was not surprised when I found out that Treasures From the Wreck of the Unbelievable is actually a mockumentary to compliment Damien Hirst's (the aforementioned 'bored artist') new collection. I'd like to say that, but I really can't. There were signs, for sure, but I think I didn't want to notice them. I wanted to believe. For example, I was wondering why they were able to whisk away all the treasures to a foreign country. I've watched enough actual documentaries to know that a whole lot of it has to stay in the country where its found, for various reasons. I was concerned when they were bringing up all the gold pieces in broad daylight without any cover, to me that just screamed dangerous. In that respect, I figured they just did re-shoots after the fact, so that they could get the maximum emotional response from the audience. Then there was the demon statue, which came out of the water at a height of about 4 feet. Once it made it to the museum, it had grown substantially to about 60 feet. Then there were the three busts, the camera pans across the back and the word "CHINA" is clearly visible... I was confused by that one. And of course, the one that bothered my husband the most, Mickey Mouse. As I googled this subject, I found that many (within and without the art world) were incensed that Hirst would dare do something like this. How could he possible have duped everyone and filmed this fake movie about a fake ancient legend (Amotan's full name is Cif Amotan II, which is an anagram for "I am Fiction", and his ship, the Apistos, translated to "unbelievable".), and filled it with unimaginative art to bring crowds to his new exhibit? Those in the art world were outraged and screamed that this was the end of his career. Lay people were angry at being tricked into believing it was all real. I thought the sculpture was beautiful. There was no rhyme or reason to the collection, and I loved that about it. I liked the fact that he took these art forms that have been done and redone, polished them, then added the sea life to breathe new life into it, so to speak. And I love that I was tricked - that I did believe. That is what makes a mockumentary great, when you believe that it is real, and say "you got me", when you find out that it was not. Not only did he create the art, but also a fantastic mythos to go with it. Bottom line, I thoroughly enjoyed this movie, from beginning to end. I recommend you watch it if you haven't already, even if you now know that none of it is real. Visit artsy.net if you're interested in seeing more from Damien Hirst or perhaps thinking about purchasing an original piece of his art.
Do you have a product or service you'd like me to review? Click here to send me a message (use "REVIEW" in the subject line) or DM me on Twitter I don't really know where to begin. I am a huge fan of the Dark Tower series. I, among legions of DT fans, have been clamoring for a Roland & Co. movie for what seems like ages. This movie feels like an insult. Once the announcement was made that a movie was going to (finally) make it to the big screen, I scoured the internet for months, reading everything I could get my greedy little eyeballs on just to get a tidbit of information. I felt disappointment (and anger, at times), right from the beginning, and I wasn't even sure I was actually going to watch the movie. I was torn, fighting my internal struggle; should I go and see the movie to satisfy my curiosity? Or even wait until it comes out On Demand, which probably would have been a better option, because Hubby and I were both having a really, really difficult time not yelling out in frustration throughout most of the movie. Or, the third option of not seeing it at all, ever, but my curiosity wouldn't let me adhere to option three, I think. I decided to go and see it in the theater last night. I went in trying really, really hard to keep an open mind, about the casting (you can read my feelings about the casting here), about the storyline (or lack of), about the damage that was being done to one of my most treasured stories. It was difficult, but I tried. After about 5 minutes (or was it 5 seconds?), I knew that was going to be impossible, I was already shaking my head in confusion and throwing my hands up in frustration. So I tried plan B... throw the book out of my mind and just try to watch it like a movie, one that is telling a story I don't know, like any other I watch for the first time. So, here is my review of The Dark Tower: Synopsis: My Synopsis? I really suck at them, which is why I gave you the one I googled. But I'll try. A gunslinger reluctantly teams up with a young boy to fight some evil guy who is trying to kidnap said young boy to bring down a tower with mind laser beams. My Review: You may have noticed (if you didn't know already) from my synopsis that I was not too impressed. To say that this movie is based on Stephen King's Dark Tower series is like saying the Family Guy TV Show is based on the Bible. That is to say that there are some characters who have the same name and perhaps a passing resemblance to someone in the book. With that out of the way, I can say that if you haven't read the books, you may be a little confused. We don't get a whole lot of depth to the characters, therefore, we don't really care about them. We don't really understand just how important the tower is, and so we don't care if they're bringing it down. We really only get a sense of revenge from the gunslinger, so why should we care if he's successful in bringing down Walter? The movie is plodding, uninteresting and made me throw my hands up in frustration more than once. The acting and plotline is mediocre and this movie is a mess. IMDb rating - I think this may be generous. Rotten Tomatoes score - I agree with the critics. The animosity I feel towards this movie will most likely boil over and I'll HAVE to write a post on how much the movie differs from the books, but how much, really can you fit into an hour and a half? For now, I'll have to be satisfied with the fact that the ending provided very little reason to make another one. I give this movie 1 out of 5 movie passes.
Art by Eredel "The man in black fled across the desert, and the gunslinger followed." - Stephen King, The Dark Tower Book One: The Gunslinger, 1982 If you haven't read Stephen King's magnum opus, The Dark Tower, you need to put down what you're doing, set aside a week or two, and read it. It's that good. It doesn't even matter whether you're a Stephen King fan or not, this superbly written tale transcends worlds and time, seamlessly blending sci-fi, fantasy, horror, and western genres, and tells a moving tale of love and friendship, terrible loss, and the ultimate quest. The story spans 8 books (and a short story), with the first installment, The Gunslinger, published in 1982. Book Two, The Drawing of the Three was released in 1987. Book Three, The Wastelands in 1991, with the fourth, Wizard and Glass following in 1997. In 2003 we received Book Five, Wolves of the Calla, and in 2004 we were blessed with 2 offerings, Books Six and Seven, Song of Susannah and The Dark Tower, respectively. In 2012 we saw the release of The Wind Through the Keyhole. {The story, it seems, was not done with Mr. King - there were still tales to tell.} TWTTK is the eighth book to be released, but it falls somewhere in between WAG (#4) and WOTC (#5), kind of like a 4.5, as it tells tales of a younger Roland Deschain. I will also mention The Little Sisters of Eluria, which is a short story found in Everything's Eventual. It is kind of a 0.5, although I recommend that TLSOE (#0.5) and TWTTK (4.5) are read after you have completed the 'first' seven books, as they are really just side stories, a little extra gravy on your poutine. There are also the comics, or graphic novels, which tell the tales of Roland's first Ka-Tet. Any actual synopsis of the story will never do it justice, there are just too many subtle nuances intertwined with backstories, love stories, courage, friendship, battle stories, and characters that are so vibrant and rich you believe they actually exist. I will tell you just the basic story, sort of a Cole's Notes of a Cole's Notes. Stripped down to it's bare bones, Stephen King tells a story about a gunslinger on an epic quest through Mid-World. According to the master himself, it's Lord of the Rings meets King Arthur meets Clint Eastwood. I have read this series in full about six or seven times now. All this talk about the movie is making me want to start it again, it's that good. Every time I read it I feel new feelings about different situations, like reading the books with a fresh pair of eyes. Ever since we got a little tease in The Mist, a 2007 movie where the protagonist, David, who paints movie posters for a living is seen painting a Dark Tower poster, myself and countless other DT fans have been holding our breath waiting for the announcement that Roland and his Ka-Tet will make it to the big screen. When the announcement finally arrived, I was shattered. Ron Howard had signed on to direct. Don't get me wrong, I enjoyed Lady in the Lake, The Missing, and Apollo 13, among others not adapted for the big screen from novels. However, Mr. Howard takes too many liberties and butchers other people's work. DaVinci Code, anyone? How the authors allow it, I will never understand. I get that they think, "ooh, what would happen if Mr. X went with the blue shirt rather than the yellow", but we bibliophiles love the book for what it is. Streamlining for time constraints is one thing, but completely changing the story flow, characters, and/or ending just because is quite another. From IMDb.com Since then, I have heard that he will co-direct and then that he had to remove himself from the project (YAY!) because he couldn't dedicate enough time to the project to do it justice. Now it seems that he is still tied to the project, just as a producer. I don't care why he's gone, I'm just happy he is. The new director is a guy named Nikolaj Arcel. Never heard of him? Yeah, me either. He has directed five whole movies since 2001, and one of those is a short. I haven't seen nor heard of even one of the movies he is credited with directing. And this is the guy who will be taking on the epic genius of Stephen King's Dark Tower, a series which is supposed to be turned into three movies with the possibility of a "when Roland was young" set on Netflix? I'm not sure how I feel about that. From IMDb.com And now I will tackle the controversy that is causing some stir in the DT community. Casting. I will discuss Idris Elba, who is causing most of the stir, but I have other concerns first. Take a look at the above list of actors who have been cast. I am extremely concerned that I don't see Susannah and Dean on this list yet. Are we doing Movie One only with Jake? Yes, Susannah and Dean don't enter the story until the second book, but the first book is actually the shortest of all (it started it's life as a short story sold to a magazine initially), and most of the roles I see on the list above don't show up in it. While we're on the topic of roles that don't show up until later in the series, let's tackle the character of "Tirana". I actually had to google this, because I have read the series in it's entirety numerous times, and I'll be honest with you, I draw a blank with this one. Apparently I'm not alone. "Tirana is definitely not the female lead in the novels. In fact, she’s so obscure that even hardcore fans don’t seem quite sure who she is — I’ve seen some readers swear up and down that no one named Tirana exists in the books." -slashfilm.com So she's the 'lead' female character in the movie, and no one remembers her. Apparently she shows up in Book Seven. As far as I remember, Susannah Dean/Detta Walker gets the title of Lead. I'm also relatively sure that anyone who has read DT would agree. Oh, and by the way, if Tirana is supposed to be kind of Susannah, but different, congrats Hollywood, you just cast yet another white woman in a clearly black role. Just sayin'. Art by RavenMedia As for the other roles already cast, Pimli & Sayre are from much later in the books, Susan is from a lifetime away (Roland's first love), I'm confused about Arra, another minor character I had to google to remember (and seems to me almost a character within a story within a story), who really doesn't seem that important. Rounding out the questions is which character will Katheryn Winnick play? Judging from the fact that we have Jake, his best friend, and his shrink cast, many are speculating she will play his mother, who is absentee at best in the Jake story, and totally unnecessary in a film adaptation. The first movie seems way too much Jake and the battle of Algul Siento, with a little Mejis and some Low Men thrown in for good measure. I'm not sure that picking these particular elements to introduce the story are a good choice. I guess the time has come to speak about the whole controversy surrounding Idris Elba as the gunslinger himself, Roland Deschain. Please do not take my next comments as racist. I like to think that I am not. Roland is not a black man. Do you know how I and anyone in the DT fanverse know this? Above all else, it is because Detta (split personality within Odetta/Detta/Susannah character) likes to call him a "honky mahfah" more often than not. She is, as I mentioned before, a very important character in the DT series. When we first meet her, she is a horribly racist, emotionally scarred, scary as hell, black woman. She is an amazing character and one of the strongest female black characters I have ever encountered, whether on screen or on the page. Since it looks like they're removing her past (modern-day New York, she's from 1964 New York), are they also removing a crucial part of her storyline? What she went through because of who she is matters, and it made her the powerhouse she is as Susannah. Maybe they'll just make her white? Hey, we can still have the racism thing then, right? As I mentioned previously, there is talk that white actress Abbey Lee is playing the 'lead female' character, although hers has a different name. But I digress. Mr. Elba is an incredibly talented actor. Avengers, Thor, Pacific Rim, and Prometheus, just a few of the movies that jump to mind where he is memorable. And I'll be completely honest with you, I've seen shots from the set and some concept art, and he looks bad-ass as the gunslinger. If you haven't read the books and aren't fanatic about them, he is a fantastic choice. The colour of an actor on page vs on screen actually doesn't really bother me (Morgan Freeman playing a middle-aged Irishman in The Shawshank Redemption quickly comes to mind), if race plays no part in the story. If you cut out the whole Odetta part, I really wouldn't take issue with this casting choice, I would totally embrace it. Thing is (I know I keep going back to this, but it matters), Roland, Dean, and Odetta/Detta must cross this bridge to get to where they're going. There's no real way around it. Unless you are telling a different story. And maybe that is exactly what is happening here. I know, this is such a long post! Can you tell it means so much to me? Honestly, even after writing all of this, I still can't even touch upon how much of an impact these books have had on me. I promise it's almost over, and for those of you who made it this far... thanks for sticking with me. Two things remain to discuss. First I want to talk about Mathew McConaughey as The Man in Black. I will take a thousand black Rolands over this choice. He is not exactly stellar acting material. Yes, yes, we were all (shockingly) really impressed by him in True Detective. But one good role does not automatically make you ready or able to play all roles they way they need to be played. Randall Flagg is no surfer dude and his idea of a good time is not the same as ours. Click his name and check out Matthew's filmography. Prolific, but not exactly the stuff Oscars are made of. On top of my already negative feel towards Mr. McConaughey, I read somewhere that he was going to take a crazy, anything goes type of approach to the role. I immediately pictured him trying to channel Ledger's Joker from beneath the hood. I think I even cried a little as a small part of me died inside. I just feel like each casting announcement they make is one mistake after another, just compounding the issues. I will leave you with my personal picks on who should play the main characters. I'm not getting into Sayre or Tirana or Timmy, because they just don't matter at this point in the game. Most of my picks have been my picks for a really long time, some had to change because those I envisioned had the audacity to get old while I held my breath for this movie. Roland Deschain A.K.A. The Gunslinger
Honorable mention goes to Hugh Jackman. Randall Flagg A.K.A. The Man in Black It is not easy to find a great 'picture' of him, and for good reason, he is every nightmare you're ever had all rolled into one, especially the ones that started out as wonderful dreams.
Jake Chambers
I'm okay with the casting of Tom Taylor as Jake (shocking, I know), he's obviously very close to who I originally envisioned playing this role. I would like to point out that Jaden was really enjoyable to watch in After Earth, so he's my actual pick for this role. Eddie Dean Who? Those not in the DT fandom probably haven't heard this name yet. Either he hasn't been cast, or he's not in this movie. Doesn't matter, he is a pivotal part of Roland's Ka-Tet.
Honorable mention goes to the one and only Keanu Reeves. Susannah Dean A.K.A Odetta/Detta Walker Another character so pivotal to the story who has neither been cast nor mentioned by the people involved in the DT movie. She is absolutely the one and only female lead in this series!
Danai's Michonne character on The Walking Dead has evolved in a way very similar to Susannah's journey - harsh & alone to caring & mother-figure The Director A.K.A. the Guy in Charge Okay, so he's not a character - but he (or she) is so important because he has to be making the correct decisions right from the start. Who's that guy with all the awards? Why, Peter Jackson, my friends! He has always been and always will be my absolute number one and only choice for directing a movie of this scope and magnitude. Period. Whew! That was a long one. I think this is my magnum opus of blog posts - it took me about three days to get this all together.
How about you? Any thoughts on casting? Are you going to see the movie(s), or even better, if you haven't read the books, has my zeal inspired you to do so? Three words: Go See It. I admit, I'm a bit of a geek when it comes to superheroes. I love them and they're pretty much the only movies that I'll give up the equivalent of a mortgage payment to go see in the theaters. Usually because even if they're not that great, you still get enough action to get you through the 2+ hours. However, what Joss Whedon has been doing with this franchise is simply amazing. We have a whole cast of characters who could (and have) carry an entire movie, even franchise, all by themselves and he's taken them, put them together and instead of a jumbled mess we get a fantastic storyline not only because of what they're banding together to fight against, but also because of the dynamics of all the relationships formed and the way all of these 'alpha' personalities interact with each other. The quick synopsis, without any spoilers, is that Tony Stark and Bruce Banner create something with the good intentions of creating a world that doesn't need the Avengers anymore. If that worked out this would have been a documentary and not an action flick, so you know something goes horribly wrong and its up to the Avengers to make it all better while causing trillions in property damage. This movie has everything. You will laugh, you will cry, hold your breath, gasp, smile, and most of all, be thoroughly entertained. We get those wonderful one-liners we all love that run rampant in the Marvel Universe (can't wait to see what Deadpool comes up with), people die, some come back from the dead, which you already knew if you watch the Marvel Agents of Shield TV Show (Coulson gave you the spoiler alert already) we meet The Vision (who makes us all gasp, especially Thor), Quicksilver and the Scarlet Witch, and there are not one, but two love stories! No, it's not Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch, they're actually brother and sister. Another thing that is really wonderful about this particular movie is that even with all of this action, adventure and mayhem going on, we actually get to learn a lot about the Avengers individually, which is an amazing feat, considering the scope of what's going on. We see a different side of Clint (Hawkeye), Natasha (Widow), and Banner/Hulk. However, noticeably absent are two love interests: Pepper and Jane. Apparently both are super busy (according to Thor and Stark) and just couldn't make it for the festivities. So there you have it. This movie grabs you by the throat in the first 5 seconds, and will not let go until the very end! Go see it, you will be glad that you did. I give this movie 5 out of 5 movie passes - and I would give it 10 if I could!! Here is the synopsis and ratings according to rottentomatoes.com Don't forget to visit the Avengers Facebook page!!
As per usual, the bad guys get killed in droves, the good guys barely bleed and everything is alright with the world again at the end of the movie. I loved the fact that Harrison Ford's character couldn't understand Statham's english - even asking what language he was speaking - yet somehow carried on a conversation with Schwarzenegger with absolutely no difficulty! And two strange things happen in The Expendables: Mel Gibson is the bad guy and Antonio Banderas is a seriously silly killer begging for a job. I thought both did a great job being these guys who are complete opposite of regular roles we're used to seeing them in. Gibson had the crazy eyes and creepy voice going on, totally getting into the whole bad guy thing. Banderas was too cute and so funny. All in all, I would recommend this movie - as a rental. I give this movie 3.5 out of 5 movie passes! Here's the film's synopsis from rottentomatoes.com, where the movie got a score of 35% from movie critics and 54% from movie goers: In The Expendables 3, Barney (Stallone), Christmas (Statham) and the rest of the team come face-to-face with Conrad Stonebanks (Gibson), who years ago co-founded The Expendables with Barney. Stonebanks subsequently became a ruthless arms trader and someone who Barney was forced to kill... or so he thought. Stonebanks, who eluded death once before, now is making it his mission to end The Expendables -- but Barney has other plans. Barney decides that he has to fight old blood with new blood, and brings in a new era of Expendables team members, recruiting individuals who are younger, faster and more tech-savvy. The latest mission becomes a clash of classic old-school style versus high-tech expertise in the Expendables' most personal battle yet. Visit the official Facebook page here.
This movie has been in theaters for about two weeks now and has brought in over $310 million, and there is good reason for that. This movie will make you cry with laughter, especially if you are of the generation that grew up in the eighties, as there are some pretty funny jokes about that age. If you stay until after the full credits roll, you will get the usual Marvel clip. This was the only part that disappointed me for this movie. While what we got was a surprise (I will not give it away), I was kinda expecting Ironman, so I guess that's why I wasn't as excited by who actually makes a cameo. My suggestion? Go see this movie. You will not be sorry. I give this movie 5 out of 5 movie passes!
|
AuthorHi! I'm Sonja and I'm glad you're here! I'm happy to share some recipes and gardening tips with you while I let you know about great (or not so great) products, services, and media I encounter. Visit my online shop at MysteriousDragonfyre.com
for Crystals, Herbs, Incense, and other Witchy things! Categories
All
Hey look! You're visitor #
Visit my online shop at MysteriousDragonfyre.com
for Crystals, Herbs, Incense, and other Witchy things! |